Winlock child molestation case from late 1990s resurrected

2015.0612.lawandorder.final

•••

By Sharyn L. Decker
Lewis County Sirens news reporter

CHEHALIS – A 60-year-old Toledo-area man appeared in Lewis County Superior Court yesterday in response to a summons, after learning he was accused for the second time of inappropriately touching a 5-year-old girl almost 18 years ago.

Steven M. Nowlen is charged with first-degree child molestation.

According to charging documents, the allegations were investigated when the alleged victim was a child, but recently the now-22-year-old reported the matter to the Lewis County Sheriff’s Office.

Nowlen was distressed to learn news reporters were present during his hearing.

“This isn’t going to be in the newspaper is it,” he asked outside the courtroom. “This is embarrassing.”

Nowlen said the allegation was investigated years ago, and suggested he couldn’t understand why it was getting looked at again.

“I took a lie detector and passed it with flying colors,” he said.

The charge, filed on May 18 in Lewis County Superior Court, alleges sexual contact sometime between Nov. 1, 1998 and March 1, 1999.

The allegation is the child was at her aunts home in Winlock, taking a bath with her cousin and the aunt’s boyfriend touched her between her legs when it was time to get out of the tub.

The court documents indicate the case was re-investigated beginning this past November.

Sheriff’s detective Jeremy Almond gathered records and conducted interviews and found the original case records were incomplete. In 2000, Winlock Police Chief Forrest McPherson suddenly died and there is no record of what happened with the case after the child was examined at St. Peter’s Sexual Assault Clinic.

Lewis County Deputy Prosecutor Sheila Weirth wrote in the court documents that information from the medical examination revealed a condition “which can be seen in children who have been sexually abused, but is not a specific finding of sexual abuse.” The clinic recommended further police investigation.

Nowlen when interviewed by the detective denied ever inappropriately touching the child and told him he passed a polygraph in the 1990s, according to Weirth. There is no record of him taking one at that time, Weirth wrote.

Lewis County Superior Court Judge Richard Brosey was told yesterday afternoon it appeared Nowlen qualified for a court appointed lawyer. Centralia attorney David Arcuri was appointed.

The offense carries a maximum penalty of life in prison.

Prosecutors requested and were granted a $10,000 unsecured bond as a condition of release. Nowlen’s arraignment is scheduled for June 16.

Tags: ,

7 Responses to “Winlock child molestation case from late 1990s resurrected”

  1. Bo Rupert says:

    I agree with you wholeheartedly JZ, this is a very unnecessary case and this man will forever have this hanging over his head. But Johnathan Meyer and his worthless prosecutors don’t care one bit about the lives they ruin

  2. J.Z. says:

    What does a trial matter now? It was investigated at the time, and nothing sufficient was found to warrant prosecution. Now, when the girl has had a lifetime of being told she was molested, it gets brought back up. Even if it never happened, she might have fully-formed memories, based solely on having been told it happened. If some jury of knuckleheads does find him guilty, it’ll set a record for being overturned on appeal, once a higher court (with more intelligent people than Lewis County can field) reviewing the allegations.

    But innocent or not, the man’s name is now inextricably tied with allegations of child molestation. Wherever he goes, the label will be hanging from his neck, even if the case gets dropped tomorrow.

  3. Bo Rupert says:

    I totally agree Bleebloo, I hope that evidence proves his innocence

  4. Ashlee says:

    This is so not true he help raise two girls after and also two boys and never touch any of them. He also has grandkids and would Never do that.

  5. BleeBloo says:

    So easy to find him guilty, isn’t it you dingbats? How many innocent men have gone to prison because a victim suddenly “remembers” something from twenty years ago and everyone takes her side? He deserves his day in court.

  6. BobbyinLC says:

    I agree Bo. If it is PROVEN he is guilty then he should suffer the penalty. I hope the investigators have looked to see if there have been any other accusations in the 15 years between then and now. Child molesters generally do not go that long without trying to “satisfy” their warped desires.

  7. Bo Rupert says:

    If he did touch this child inappropriately I am all for hauling him off to prison. However, a lot of years have went by. I really hope that this all comes out in court. He should definitely go to trial. It is the best way to prove his innocence or guilt. A trial is definitely the best way to go for both the prosecution and the defense. If I were in his shoes I would definitely go seek a trial before a jury of my peers.